tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6197653098145489552.post4228014779078640012..comments2020-04-12T16:21:41.705-07:00Comments on Salt: 430 Years Where? : The Deads Sea Scrolls and Bible Chronology.Stanley Loperhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08375288990836726724noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6197653098145489552.post-66859877266793095172020-04-12T16:21:41.705-07:002020-04-12T16:21:41.705-07:00I agree. This is not an N. It is the top of the La...I agree. This is not an N. It is the top of the Lamed from the line underneath. I've studied this exact copy of 4Q14 and other copies since 1954. I agree with the idea of Canaan being included in the original Hebrew manuscripts and subsequent shortening of the sojourn in Egypt, but unfortunately this particular argument just isn't valid as it's clearly part of the line below.Nate Loperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03640640359140156594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6197653098145489552.post-86330683671386013412020-04-12T16:19:45.300-07:002020-04-12T16:19:45.300-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Nate Loperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03640640359140156594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6197653098145489552.post-85588450729042901902019-02-26T20:06:49.175-08:002019-02-26T20:06:49.175-08:00You've circled a lamed, not a nun--the lamed b...You've circled a lamed, not a nun--the lamed belongs to the line below it (it spells "sheloshim" meaning "thirty"). Space considerations actually back up the Masoretic text.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10304500258195988887noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6197653098145489552.post-20071949051037304292017-03-21T19:28:07.856-07:002017-03-21T19:28:07.856-07:00Well done brother even Nehemiah Gordon follows you...Well done brother even Nehemiah Gordon follows your deduction on including Canaan in the calculation.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04111586131306363382noreply@blogger.com