First of all I question the
premise of the question. I’ve seen
various figures around on the net and decided to dig a little. The figures depend much on how you define
things and what you do or do not consider “Christian” nations. For instance some folks lump the neo-Pagan
Nazis with their massacre of around 20,000,000 people into the “Christian”
category simply to pad the case against Christianity because the nation they
ruled was nominally Christian.
I finally decided to go with
an essay by one Kirk Durston, National Director, New Scholars Society. He cites a figure put forward by a political
scientist, Rudolph J. Rummel,
who figures about 284,638,000 people were killed for either religious or
ideological reasons throughout human history.
Of that number 151,491,000 were killed in the last one-hundred years
with Communism, Nazi Germany and Nationalist China accounting for 141,160,000,
nearly 50%. Communism by itself accounts
for about 110,000,000 of those deaths.
I can hear atheist readers
rejoicing over that one. “That means
that over half of those killed were killed by Christians.” Not so fast.
The remaining people were killed by Christianity and all other
religions and ideologies combined. The
figures for how many deaths can be laid at Christendom’s feet vary from
2,000,000 up to 50,000,000. Even if I’m
generous, that means that the violence and death toll for 2,000 years of
Christian history is less than one-half the death toll of Communism in the last
one-hundred years alone. There is no
real comparison! So “Christianity” is
nowhere near as deadly as modern atheist and secular ideologies.
Now that we’ve taken care of
that, let me state for the record that I am not about to defend the horrible
record of cruelties and abuse of their fellow man by people calling themselves
Christian. It is horrible and all of
those who are called by that name should be appalled at the abuse heaped on
God’s name by such a terrible record. I
condemn it from the deepest wellsprings of my heart. So how do I justify being a Christian with
that record associated with the name?
It is simple; the religious/political
nations we know today as Christian are Christian in name only. They represent a fallen Church which left the
teachings of her founder and reached out to become a temporal power. And they pay lip-service to the teachings of
the one they claim to represent. As such
they bring reproach on the names of both their founder and his God and stand
rightly condemned. I choose to follow
the founder and his teachings with all my heart and thus am proud to be called
Christian, or Christ like, the meaning of the name.
When Jesus founded the Church
he didn’t found a nascent world ruler which was supposed to grow and take
bloody rulership. He founded a movement. Those are two different things. Jesus intended the Church to declare the
Gospel, or good News, to people of all nations as a witness and make disciples
out of people from those nations (Matt. 28:18-20). That was not a mandate to go out and take
over the whole world and force it into submission like the mandate Muhammad
gave Islam. There is no permission in
that command to take temporal power, for that temporal power will be taken once
the true Church is empowered in heaven (Rom. 8:15-17; Rev. 20:1-6). As a movement it was to operate anywhere
under any ruler during conditions both friendly and hostile. As a movement it couldn’t be stamped out and
could go about its current mandate to make disciples out of people everywhere
and did so to some extent or another throughout the Gospel age.
As a Christian I follow
Jesus’ teachings to love God, my neighbor and my fellow Christians. That means I obey the laws of the land such
much as is physically and spiritually possible and do my best to harm no other
person except in self-defense. And I’ll
try to avoid situations which make that necessary to the greatest extent
possible. In doing so I am fulfilling
God’s law, as Paul pointed out at Romans 13:10.
Far from bathing in the blood of innocents true Christians have more
often than not been among the victims.
Instead they’ve been a movement for peace and love, however dimly their
lights were able to shine through the obscurity of persecution.
That, my friends, is how I’m
able to justify being called by the name Christian despite the bloody record
charged against it.
Durston, Kirk; Retrieved at, http://www.newscholars.com/papers /Killing,%20Christianity,%20and%20Atheism.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment